2009/11/5 Edward Kmett :
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Stefan Monnier
> wrote:
>>
>> > We could really use a case statement in which we skip the scrutinee and
>> > make
>> > (case of {})' be syntactic sugar for `(\x -> case x of {})'.
>>
>> > So we could write:
>>
>> >> myFunc = anotherFunc $
Don't these things generally get added as LANGUAGE pragmas though? If
it's off by default then peoples code should be okay.
Also, I'd prefer something like `cases` as the keyword, rather than
`case of`, mostly for aesthetics, but also so that, upon visual
inspection, I wouldn't wonder where
