I've been trying to get in touch with the maintainers of the Binary
package, to report an issue. When I emailed the addresses given on
Hackage, I got an automated response saying I had used an address that
was no longer current.
I don't want to put pressure on anyone to fix my bug -- I didn't
Pete Chown <1...@234.cx> writes:
> This code attempts to create an infinite list of random numbers -- a
> technique also used by network-dns. It turns out that this code works
> with binary-0.4.4 but not with binary-0.5.0.2.
There was a deliberate change in strictness in 0.5 making binary strict
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Pete Chown <1...@234.cx> wrote:
> I've been trying to get in touch with the maintainers of the Binary package,
> to report an issue. When I emailed the addresses given on Hackage, I got an
> automated response saying I had used an address that was no longer current.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Alexey Khudyakov
wrote:
> Here is code I use to work around this issue:
>
Forgot to mention. This code checks for end of input. Your data is
infinite so you simplify
definition if you like
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Has
Alexey Khudyakov writes:
> This issue was discussed on the list before. Get monad definition
> was changed in binary 0.5.0.2. It was made strict and evaluation
> of result of runGet is forced. This increased performance but
> broke programs which relies on lazyness to work.
I just found a more d
