--- Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> Ah! Just as I thought, SML really was trying very
> hard ;)
Quite possibly so, but no reason to follow down that
slippery slope ;)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the bes
On 1/16/06, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebastian.sylvan:
> > On 1/15/06, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > sebastian.sylvan:
> > > > On 1/15/06, Isaac Gouy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Haskell now ranked 2nd overall, only a point or so
> > > > >
jupdike:
> > > Maybe we finally have enough motivation to move to
> > > some other measurement of program volume :-)
>
> > I'm not sure how you could do this better, though... Maybe counting
> > the number of "tokens" (not sure how you'd define that though)
>
> I was thinking the same thing for t
sebastian.sylvan:
> On 1/15/06, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sebastian.sylvan:
> > > On 1/15/06, Isaac Gouy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Haskell now ranked 2nd overall, only a point or so
> > > > > behind C:
> > > >
> > > > It was always obvious that the "Write the pr
> > Maybe we finally have enough motivation to move to
> > some other measurement of program volume :-)
> I'm not sure how you could do this better, though... Maybe counting
> the number of "tokens" (not sure how you'd define that though)
I was thinking the same thing for the past few weeks: that
On 1/15/06, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebastian.sylvan:
> > On 1/15/06, Isaac Gouy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Haskell now ranked 2nd overall, only a point or so
> > > > behind C:
> > >
> > > It was always obvious that the "Write the program
> > > as-if lines of code
sebastian.sylvan:
> On 1/15/06, Isaac Gouy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Haskell now ranked 2nd overall, only a point or so
> > > behind C:
> >
> > It was always obvious that the "Write the program
> > as-if lines of code were not being measured" clause
> > relied too heavily on contributors wil
I have added the debugged non-memory-leaking and now sped-up-with-trees
version of the fasta code to the wiki:
http://haskell.org/hawiki/FastaEntra
This will be submitted soon. I do not think this is a good candidate
for lines-of-code compression/obfuscation.
In speed this entry runs 5.0 times
On 1/15/06, Isaac Gouy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Haskell now ranked 2nd overall, only a point or so
> > behind C:
>
> It was always obvious that the "Write the program
> as-if lines of code were not being measured" clause
> relied too heavily on contributors willingness to
> co-operate.
>
> ht
> Haskell now ranked 2nd overall, only a point or so
> behind C:
It was always obvious that the "Write the program
as-if lines of code were not being measured" clause
relied too heavily on contributors willingness to
co-operate.
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/faq.php#implementlist
Maybe w
Ketil Malde wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald Bruce Stewart) writes:
Haskell now ranked 2nd overall, only a point or so behind C:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all
Very impressive! And note that if you put zero weight on memory use,
GHC wins by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald Bruce Stewart) writes:
> :D
>
> Haskell now ranked 2nd overall, only a point or so behind C:
>
> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all
Very impressive! And note that if you put zero weight on memory use,
GHC wins by a large margin. (
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 14:01 +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> :D
>
> Haskell now ranked 2nd overall, only a point or so behind C:
>
> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=allā©=all
>
> And still a bit more we can squeeze out...
I saw it a day or two ago, but thought i
:D
Haskell now ranked 2nd overall, only a point or so behind C:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all
And still a bit more we can squeeze out...
-- Don
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://w
14 matches
Mail list logo
