Peter Verswyvelen schrieb: > Related to this issue, I have a question here. > > I might be wrong, but it seems to me that some Haskellers don't like > writing monads (with do notation) or arrows (with proc sugar) because of > the fact they have to abandon the typical applicative syntax, which is > so close to the beautiful lambda calculus core. Or is it maybe because > some people choose monads were the less linear applicative style could > be used instead, so the choice of monads is not always appropriate. > > Haskell is full of little hardcoded syntax extensions: list notation > syntactic, list comprehensions, and even operator precedence that > reduces the need for parentheses, etc...
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Syntactic_sugar/Cons _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
