On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:08:02PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> I believe that it the simplest way for programmer. But is that the
> best way for users? i want to make building/installation as simple as
> possible using Cabal infrastructure. is it possible that some box will
> have Cabal, but no
Hi
I would *guess* that hsc2hs is always distributed with ghc. I know it
is on Linux and BSD -- I am not sure about Windows.
It is.
If you want to support hugs as well, then they would need hschs-hugs
installed. Debian includes that with hugs by default -- not sure about
anyone else.
Windows
At Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:08:02 +0400,
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> I believe that it the simplest way for programmer. But is that the
> best way for users? i want to make building/installation as simple as
> possible using Cabal infrastructure. is it possible that some box will
> have Cabal, but not hsc
Hello Jeremy,
Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 10:47:09 PM, you wrote:
>> what is a best way to bring C constant (defined in header file) into
>> the Haskell source?
> If this ^^^ was your entire question, I would say, use hsc2hs.
> http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/hsc2hs.html
>
At Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:28:13 +0400,
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
>
> Hello Haskell,
>
> what is a best way to bring C constant (defined in header file) into
> the Haskell source?
If this ^^^ was your entire question, I would say, use hsc2hs.
http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/hs
Hello Haskell,
what is a best way to bring C constant (defined in header file) into
the Haskell source? Haskell project is cabalized and should work with
both Win and Unix while the constants are OS-specific. the best way i
found at this moment is to use the following scheme:
mmap.h:
#if defined
