2011/3/29 Bryan Edds :
> Hi Jake!
>
>> My only question is this: what does your language offer that others do
>> not with respect to soft real time systems? The language you describe in
>> the linked forum thread looks neat, but I think I'm missing the
>> reasoning behind its design. Why is this de
Hi Jake!
> My only question is this: what does your language offer that others do
> not with respect to soft real time systems? The language you describe in
> the linked forum thread looks neat, but I think I'm missing the
> reasoning behind its design. Why is this design beneficial for soft re
I share your dream of being able to write high-level code for soft real
time software, so while I'm not interested in working on your project
directly at this time, it's still in my best interest for it to be
successful.
My only question is this: what does your language offer that others do
n
Hello fellow Haskellers!
I have a language I would like to prototype in Haskell. It's a
'language-oriented' programming language based on Lisp, ML, and Python. It's a
relatively small language, but should be powerful enough to have many of its
features implemented in terms of itself (classes, a
