[Haskell-cafe] We tried this functional, higher-order stuff with LISP and look what happened...

2009-05-27 Thread Jason Dusek
What can we say to that? I'm well practiced in handling those who reject types outright (Python programmers), those who reject what is too different (C programmers), those who can not live without objects (Java programmers), those who insist we must move everything to message passing

Re: [Haskell-cafe] We tried this functional, higher-order stuff with LISP and look what happened...

2009-05-27 Thread Tord Romstad
Hi all, Time to delurk. I'm a Lisper and mathematician who has been reading this group for about a year, but I haven't posted until now. On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Jason Dusek jason.du...@gmail.com wrote:  What can we say to that? I'm well practiced in handling those  who reject types

Re: [Haskell-cafe] We tried this functional, higher-order stuff with LISP and look what happened...

2009-05-27 Thread Jason Dusek
2009/05/27 Tord Romstad tord.roms...@gmail.com: I think you rarely meet embittered Lisp programmers simply because we Lispers are rarely embittered... I have a very small sample size :) -- Jason Dusek ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list