Petr P gmail.com> writes:
> Is there any reason to use
> a `par` b `pseq` (a + b)
> instead of
> a `par` b `par` (a + b)
(better ask this on parallel-haskell?)
> It seems to me that the second variant would work as well:
> The main thread would block on one of the sparked computations,
I
Dear Haskellers,
I've been playing with par and pseq, and I wonder: Is there any reason to
use
a `par` b `pseq` (a + b)
instead of
a `par` b `par` (a + b)
except that the second version sparks twice instead of just once (which
probably degrades performance a bit)? It seems to me that the sec
