Bartosz Wójcik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Win32 Core2Duo 1.8GHz 1GB RAM
>17 Mb total memory in use
>MUT time 56.97s ( 57.02s elapsed)
>%GC time 0.5%
> Win32 Core2Duo 2.2GHz 2GB RAM
> 17 Mb total memory in use
> MUT time 57.44s ( 57.53s elapsed)
> %GC time
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 02:16:26 John Meacham wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:39:35PM +0100, Ketil Malde wrote:
> > This corresponds to my experiences - 64 bits is slower, something I've
> > ascribed to the cost of increased pointer size.
>
> ghc unfortunatly also uses 64 bit integers whe
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:39:35PM +0100, Ketil Malde wrote:
> This corresponds to my experiences - 64 bits is slower, something I've
> ascribed to the cost of increased pointer size.
ghc unfortunatly also uses 64 bit integers when in 64 bit mode, so the
cost paid is increased due to that as well,
Bartosz Wójcik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> while working on my resent project I've noticed that my code seems to be
>>> faster under Windows than under Linux x64.
>> Is Windows running in 32 bit? What gcc versions are you using on each
>> system?
> Windows is 32 bit with GHC-6.8.3.
> Linux i
On Monday 24 November 2008 23:59:02 Don Stewart wrote:
> bartek:
> > Hi Everybody,
> >
> > while working on my resent project I've noticed that my code seems to be
> > faster under Windows than under Linux x64.
>
> Is Windows running in 32 bit? What gcc versions are you using on each
> system?
>
W
Hello Don,
Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 1:59:02 AM, you wrote:
> Is Windows running in 32 bit? What gcc versions are you using on each system?
there is no 64-bit ghc for windows yet, and i think that 64-bit
windows runs 32-bit programs as fast as 32-bit windows
this problem naturally splits into
john:
> Is the windows 32 or 64 bit, a while ago, ghc had trouble producing
> efficient binaries for 64 bit intel systems. Something about the
> interaction between gcc and the C it produced created some pessimal
> assembly output. I do not know how much this is still an issue though.
> You could t
Is the windows 32 or 64 bit, a while ago, ghc had trouble producing
efficient binaries for 64 bit intel systems. Something about the
interaction between gcc and the C it produced created some pessimal
assembly output. I do not know how much this is still an issue though.
You could try compiling 32
bartek:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> while working on my resent project I've noticed that my code seems to be
> faster under Windows than under Linux x64.
> More exactly this was an AI game evaluator that ran on given parameters.
> There
> was no IO performed. I've run 3 lots of test on both systems and
Hi Everybody,
while working on my resent project I've noticed that my code seems to be
faster under Windows than under Linux x64.
More exactly this was an AI game evaluator that ran on given parameters. There
was no IO performed. I've run 3 lots of test on both systems and stored some
figures.
10 matches
Mail list logo
