> I am reading the book "The lambda calculus: Its syntax and Semantics" in the
> chapter about Godel Numbering but I am confused in some points.
>
> We know for Church Numerals, we have Cn = \fx.f^n(x) for some n>=0,
> i.e. C0= \fx.x and C
> 1 = \fx.fx.
>
> >From the above definition, I could guess
John Tromp wrote:
I am reading the book "The lambda calculus: Its syntax and Semantics" in the
chapter about Godel Numbering but I am confused in some points.
We know for Church Numerals, we have Cn = \fx.f^n(x) for some n>=0,
i.e. C0= \fx.x and C
1 = \fx.fx.
>From the above definition, I could
