Hello, Simon.
On 31 January 2013 17:24, Simon Marechal wrote:
> On 31/01/2013 13:50, Michael Snoyman wrote:
>> * To simplify, we start off with a call to injectLeftovers. This means
>> that we can entirely ignore the Leftover constructor in the main function.
>> * Since a Sink will never yield va
On 31/01/2013 13:50, Michael Snoyman wrote:
> * To simplify, we start off with a call to injectLeftovers. This means
> that we can entirely ignore the Leftover constructor in the main function.
> * Since a Sink will never yield values, we can also ignore the
> HaveOutput constructor.
> * As soon as
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Simon Marechal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have found the Conduit abstraction to be very well suited to a
> set of
> problems I am facing. I am however wondering how to implement
> "branching" conduits, and even conduit pools.
>
> I am currently in the
Hello,
I have found the Conduit abstraction to be very well suited to a set of
problems I am facing. I am however wondering how to implement
"branching" conduits, and even conduit pools.
I am currently in the process of rewriting parts (the simple parts) of
the Logstash tool. Ther
