Hi Ian,
Should gmp-devel be an archive (.a) or a shared object (.so)? If an .a,
don't I have to have an environemmt var to point at it's directory?
I tried your sequence below on unix-2.2.0.0 and still cannot resolve gmp.
I did find one gmp .rpm on one of the RHEL cds but without -devel.
Hello,
I have been trying to build the unix package on RedHat RHEL 5. Over
the weekend I read through the Cabal documentation. The unix-2.2.0.0
unix.cabal specifies the build-type attribute as Configure. Based on
Cabal doc, I should run ./configure. After this step then what? Bottom line
is
This is the GNU Multi-Precision library. You have to install that
separately, Cabal can't do that for you. You should use the redhat
package manager to install it. HTH
On Feb 4, 2008 4:43 PM, Galchin Vasili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Have you tried to build this package
more specifically the gmp unsatisfied ref shows up with the DynamicLinker.
On 2/4/08, Thomas Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know. Maybe someone on @cafe can help. (I CC'd)
On Feb 4, 2008 5:22 PM, Galchin Vasili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the gmp shared objects installed,
I don't know. Maybe someone on @cafe can help. (I CC'd)
On Feb 4, 2008 5:22 PM, Galchin Vasili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the gmp shared objects installed, i.e. .so's. Does ghc require static
linking with .a archive files?
On 2/4/08, Thomas Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:50:13AM -0600, Galchin Vasili wrote:
more specifically the gmp unsatisfied ref shows up with the DynamicLinker.
This works for me, with GHC 6.8.2 and
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/unix/2.2.0.0/unix-2.2.0.0.tar.gz
$ ghc --make Setup
$ ./Setup configure
Hi Ian,
I am trying to add new Posix functionality and it would be nice to be
able to build unix myself. In any case, I will try your suggestion and see
what happens.
Regards, Vasili
On 2/4/08, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:50:13AM -0600, Galchin Vasili
