Re: [Haskell-cafe] cabal-install 0.6.2 does not bootstrap with ghc-6.10.1 debian distribution

2009-03-08 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 15:33 -0700, Ahn, Ki Yung wrote: > I am using Debian unstable. > > The version of GHC debian package is 6.10.1+dfsg1-13, > and installed Haskell libraries (debian packages) are: > > kya...@kyavaio:~$ ghc-pkg list > /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/./package.conf: > packedstring-0.1

Re: [Haskell-cafe] cabal-install 0.6.2 does not bootstrap with ghc-6.10.1 debian distribution

2009-03-08 Thread Ahn, Ki Yung
Duncan Coutts 쓴 글: > On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 17:51 -0800, Ahn, Ki Yung wrote: >> Dear Haskellers and especially who are working on cabal-install >> and debian packaging, >> >> I sometimes clean up .ghc and .cabal in my home directory to start from >> scratch because of dependency loopholes (cabal-ins

Re: [Haskell-cafe] cabal-install 0.6.2 does not bootstrap with ghc-6.10.1 debian distribution

2009-03-08 Thread Jochem Berndsen
Ahn, Ki Yung wrote: > If anyone who are not using debian distribution ghc-6.10.1 (e.g., > general linux binary ghc-6.10.1 or source compiled one) can try > bootstrapping cabal-install 0.6.2 from scratch also finds the same > problem, I think someone should make a ticket for cabal-install. I rememb

Re: [Haskell-cafe] cabal-install 0.6.2 does not bootstrap with ghc-6.10.1 debian distribution

2009-03-08 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 17:51 -0800, Ahn, Ki Yung wrote: > Dear Haskellers and especially who are working on cabal-install > and debian packaging, > > I sometimes clean up .ghc and .cabal in my home directory to start from > scratch because of dependency loopholes (cabal-install does not have > remo

[Haskell-cafe] cabal-install 0.6.2 does not bootstrap with ghc-6.10.1 debian distribution

2009-03-07 Thread Ahn, Ki Yung
Dear Haskellers and especially who are working on cabal-install and debian packaging, I sometimes clean up .ghc and .cabal in my home directory to start from scratch because of dependency loopholes (cabal-install does not have remove option yet, so it's hard to fix when such loophole happens). To