[Haskell-cafe] cabal issue

2012-05-09 Thread Graham Berks
Given that I have the dependant packages already installed when I do $ cabal install --dry-run --global buildwrapper Resolving dependencies... In order, the following would be installed: mtl-2.1.1 (new version) aeson-0.6.0.2 (reinstall) changes: mtl-2.0.1.0 - 2.1.1 parsec-3.1.2 (reinstall)

Re: [Haskell-cafe] cabal issue

2012-05-09 Thread Graham Berks
Have solved the issue with help from JP Moresmau. Used the command cabal install --dry-run --verbose=3 --global build wrapper And this gave enough detailed info to enable me to remove the conflict and resolve the issue. Thanks goes to JP ! On Wednesday, 9 May 2012 at 09:55, Graham Berks

[Haskell-cafe] Cabal issue

2011-12-09 Thread Kevin Jardine
I understand that this may have been addressed before on this list in some form, so I'll be brief: Had problem with deprecated package, was told my only option was to wipe my Haskell install and start over. Is this true and if so, doesn't this mean that Cabal (or the package management system

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Cabal issue

2011-12-09 Thread Alexander Kjeldaas
Not what you asked for, but.. Although the documentation looks somewhat cryptic, and I have not use it at all, a nix + cabal option seems to be in the works. Search google for nix haskell. I am guessing that their Hydra continuous build system which is built on top of nix also could do wonders

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Cabal issue

2011-12-09 Thread Antoine Latter
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Kevin Jardine kevinjard...@gmail.com wrote: I understand that this may have been addressed before on this list in some form, so I'll be brief: Had problem with deprecated package, was told my only option was to wipe my Haskell install and start over. Is this

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Cabal issue

2011-12-09 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 06:20, Kevin Jardine kevinjard...@gmail.com wrote: Had problem with deprecated package, was told my only option was to wipe my Haskell install and start over. Is this true and if so, doesn't this mean that Cabal (or the package management system that it is a part of) is