Re: [Haskell-cafe] dumb monad syntax question

2006-05-15 Thread Malcolm Wallace
> I've been reading Phil Wadler's monad papers from the early '90s, > and it's been interesting to see how the monad concept evolved over > the course of those years. > But I haven't been able to track down the first use of the "do" notation for > monads. Can anyone tell me where that came from?

Re: [Haskell-cafe] dumb monad syntax question

2006-05-15 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello mvanier, Monday, May 15, 2006, 7:04:11 AM, you wrote: > I've been reading Phil Wadler's monad papers from the early '90s, and it's > been > interesting to see how the monad concept evolved over the course of those > years. > But I haven't been able to track down the first use of the "do

Re: [Haskell-cafe] dumb monad syntax question

2006-05-14 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
mvanier: > I've been reading Phil Wadler's monad papers from the early '90s, and it's > been interesting to see how the monad concept evolved over the course of > those years. But I haven't been able to track down the first use of the > "do" notation for monads. Can anyone tell me where that c

[Haskell-cafe] dumb monad syntax question

2006-05-14 Thread mvanier
I've been reading Phil Wadler's monad papers from the early '90s, and it's been interesting to see how the monad concept evolved over the course of those years. But I haven't been able to track down the first use of the "do" notation for monads. Can anyone tell me where that came from? I'd ap