Bulat Ziganshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don wrote:
> > Lionel wrote:
> > > From my understanding, the gmp is GPL, GHC statically
> > > links it on windows.
> >
> > GMP is *LGPL*.
> >
> > Supporting this is trivial with a dynamically linked / DLL
> > libgmp.
>
> the whole problem is that it lin
Hallo,
Don Stewart wrote:
>
> Supporting this is trivial with a dynamically linked / DLL libgmp. With
> a statically linked one, it is also possible, since the API calls to
> libgmp are specified.
>
Is it also possible? How?
> This shouldn't prevent commercial use -- lots of other compani
Hello Don,
Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 5:36:57 PM, you wrote:
>> From my understanding, the gmp is GPL, GHC statically links it on windows.
> GMP is *LGPL*.
> Supporting this is trivial with a dynamically linked / DLL libgmp.
the whole problem is that it links in statically, that reduces
lice
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 15:36 +0100, Lionel Barret De Nazaris wrote:
> I've just discovered the GMP license problem. (see
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ReplacingGMPNotes)
>
> From my understanding, the gmp is GPL, GHC statically links it on
> windows.
Lesser GPL: http://www.gnu.org/c
lionel:
> I've just discovered the GMP license problem. (see
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ReplacingGMPNotes)
>
> From my understanding, the gmp is GPL, GHC statically links it on windows.
> As a consequence, any program compiled using GHC must be distributed
> under a GPL compatibl
I've just discovered the GMP license problem. (see
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ReplacingGMPNotes)
From my understanding, the gmp is GPL, GHC statically links it on windows.
As a consequence, any program compiled using GHC must be distributed
under a GPL compatible license.
In the
