A little delayed, but might be useful.
I personally use icicles. I found the M-* great for narrowing results
down. I've tried anything and ido also, but icicles ended up winning,
for my taste at least.
A side note, speedbar actually *does* works for bufffers. Simply type
*b* on the speedbar and y
ching buffers works really fast.
Cheers
Ian Ross wrote:
>
> From: Ian Ross
> To: kaffeepause73
> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] howto best use emacs + tiling WM (Xmonad,DWM)
> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:12:57 +0100
> Sender: ian.skybluetra...@gmail.com
>
> I use XMonad and Ema
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:24:37 -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
> The default buffer manipulation in emacs is not great. Take a look at
> things like ido mode:
> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/InteractivelyDoThings
>
> It's approximately 3 orders of magnitude better than the default way
> :)
And anything
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 8:55 AM, kaffeepause73 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using dwm which I really love (ev. consider switching to xmonad).
>
> However when I'm working with emacs (programming haskell) und dwm I feel,
> I'm not as effecient as I eventually could be. -- I can have the shell in
> one wi
Hello,
I'm using dwm which I really love (ev. consider switching to xmonad).
However when I'm working with emacs (programming haskell) und dwm I feel,
I'm not as effecient as I eventually could be. -- I can have the shell in
one window (to execute the compiled program), but most work happens in
