Re: [Haskell-cafe] hugs segmentation fault

2004-10-29 Thread Jon Fairbairn
On 2004-10-29 at 00:50BST Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: Jon Fairbairn wrote: On 2004-10-29 at 00:03BST Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: Not much better, though: in my experience this particular exception leaves ghci in a very peculiar state, and it's usually necessary to quit and restart it before

Re: [Haskell-cafe] hugs segmentation fault

2004-10-29 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
Jon Fairbairn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 2004-10-29 at 00:50BST Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: Jon Fairbairn wrote: Well, here's a sample session I recorded just now: C:\\ghc\ghc-6.2.1\bin\ghci Prelude let p = 1 : [2 * x | x - p, x 1] in p [1*** Exception: loop Prelude 123 Fail: thread

[Haskell-cafe] hugs segmentation fault

2004-10-28 Thread Andrej Bauer
Hi, I am new to haskell, but otherwise experienced in programming languages. My first attempt at Haskell was this (on a Linux Debian) session with hugs: Type :? for help Prelude :version -- Hugs Version November 2003 Prelude let p = 1 : [2 * x | x - p, x 1] in p [1Segmentation fault Is it the

Re: [Haskell-cafe] hugs segmentation fault

2004-10-28 Thread Jon Fairbairn
On 2004-10-29 at 00:45+0200 Andrej Bauer wrote: Hi, I am new to haskell, but otherwise experienced in programming languages. My first attempt at Haskell was this (on a Linux Debian) session with hugs: Type :? for help Prelude :version -- Hugs Version November 2003 Prelude let p = 1 :

Re: [Haskell-cafe] hugs segmentation fault

2004-10-28 Thread Ben Rudiak-Gould
Jon Fairbairn wrote: In ghci you get: [1*** Exception: loop which is better. Not much better, though: in my experience this particular exception leaves ghci in a very peculiar state, and it's usually necessary to quit and restart it before it will work again. Is it coincidence that both Hugs

Re: [Haskell-cafe] hugs segmentation fault

2004-10-28 Thread Jon Fairbairn
On 2004-10-29 at 00:03BST Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: Jon Fairbairn wrote: In ghci you get: [1*** Exception: loop which is better. Not much better, though: in my experience this particular exception leaves ghci in a very peculiar state, and it's usually necessary to quit and

Re: [Haskell-cafe] hugs segmentation fault

2004-10-28 Thread Ben Rudiak-Gould
Jon Fairbairn wrote: On 2004-10-29 at 00:03BST Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: Not much better, though: in my experience this particular exception leaves ghci in a very peculiar state, and it's usually necessary to quit and restart it before it will work again. I don't think I've seen such a problem

Re: [Haskell-cafe] hugs segmentation fault

2004-10-28 Thread Fergus Henderson
On 29-Oct-2004, Ben Rudiak-Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jon Fairbairn wrote: On 2004-10-29 at 00:03BST Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: Not much better, though: in my experience this particular exception leaves ghci in a very peculiar state, and it's usually necessary to quit and restart it