In fact, unboxed arrays of tuples are represented in vector as tuples of
unboxed arrays.
On Aug 9, 2012 4:35 AM, "Ketil Malde" wrote:
> David Feuer writes:
>
> > So I was thinking about a mutable array of tuples, but to avoid
> allocating
> > tuples to modify their fields, I guess I really want
David Feuer writes:
> So I was thinking about a mutable array of tuples, but to avoid allocating
> tuples to modify their fields, I guess I really want an immutable array of
> tuples of STRefs. Just how much less efficient is this than a plain mutable
> array? might it even make sense to use para
So I was thinking about a mutable array of tuples, but to avoid allocating
tuples to modify their fields, I guess I really want an immutable array of
tuples of STRefs. Just how much less efficient is this than a plain mutable
array? might it even make sense to use parallel mutable arrays? The thoug
