[Haskell-cafe] non-functions like unsafePerformIO are not technically part of the haskell language!

2008-12-20 Thread Jason Dusek
From an old thread: non-functions like unsafePerformIO are not technically part of the haskell language! How is this true, exactly? -- _jsn |...an old thread.| http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Re%3A-Parsers-are-monadic--p11390440.html ___

Re: [Haskell-cafe] non-functions like unsafePerformIO are not technically part of the haskell language!

2008-12-20 Thread Lennart Augustsson
The current official Haskell standard is Haskell-98. There is no unsafePerformIO in there. On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Jason Dusek jason.du...@gmail.com wrote: From an old thread: non-functions like unsafePerformIO are not technically part of the haskell language! How is this true,

Re: [Haskell-cafe] non-functions like unsafePerformIO are not technically part of the haskell language!

2008-12-20 Thread Luke Palmer
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Jason Dusek jason.du...@gmail.com wrote: From an old thread: non-functions like unsafePerformIO are not technically part of the haskell language! How is this true, exactly? The Haskell 98 report (http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/), according to my

Re: [Haskell-cafe] non-functions like unsafePerformIO are not technically part of the haskell language!

2008-12-20 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 15:43 +, Lennart Augustsson wrote: The current official Haskell standard is Haskell-98. There is no unsafePerformIO in there. It's in the FFI spec which is an official addendum to Haskell 98. ;-) Duncan ___ Haskell-Cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] non-functions like unsafePerformIO are not technically part of the haskell language!

2008-12-20 Thread Lennart Augustsson
Bah! I had nothing to do with that. ;) On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.uk wrote: On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 15:43 +, Lennart Augustsson wrote: The current official Haskell standard is Haskell-98. There is no unsafePerformIO in there. It's in the FFI