Re: [Haskell-cafe] performance difference for binary-0.4.3.1 with ghc-6.8.3 and ghc-6.10

2008-11-07 Thread Don Stewart
jwlato: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Alexander Dunlap > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:36 AM, John Lato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and > >> it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has marked

Re: [Haskell-cafe] performance difference for binary-0.4.3.1 with ghc-6.8.3 and ghc-6.10

2008-10-29 Thread Don Stewart
jwlato: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > jwlato: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and > >> it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain > >> cases. With the following simple

Re: [Haskell-cafe] performance difference for binary-0.4.3.1 with ghc-6.8.3 and ghc-6.10

2008-10-29 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:40:48AM +0700, Donald Halomoan wrote: > Where can I get ghc-6.10? I cannot see it at haskell.org website. No releases from the 6.10 branch have been made yet. Thanks Ian ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.or

Re: [Haskell-cafe] performance difference for binary-0.4.3.1 with ghc-6.8.3 and ghc-6.10

2008-10-29 Thread John Lato
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jwlato: >> Hello, >> >> I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and >> it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain >> cases. With the following simple test: >> >> > import

Re: [Haskell-cafe] performance difference for binary-0.4.3.1 with ghc-6.8.3 and ghc-6.10

2008-10-29 Thread Jason Dusek
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] performance difference for binary-0.4.3.1 with ghc-6.8.3 and ghc-6.10

2008-10-28 Thread Donald Halomoan
Where can I get ghc-6.10? I cannot see it at haskell.org website. On 2008-10-29, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jwlato: >> Hello, >> >> I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and >> it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain >> cases

Re: [Haskell-cafe] performance difference for binary-0.4.3.1 with ghc-6.8.3 and ghc-6.10

2008-10-28 Thread Don Stewart
jwlato: > Hello, > > I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and > it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain > cases. With the following simple test: > > > import qualified Data.ByteString.Lazy as L > > import Data.Binary > > import Data.Bina

Re: [Haskell-cafe] performance difference for binary-0.4.3.1 with ghc-6.8.3 and ghc-6.10

2008-10-28 Thread John Lato
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Alexander Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:36 AM, John Lato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and >> it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance i

Re: [Haskell-cafe] performance difference for binary-0.4.3.1 with ghc-6.8.3 and ghc-6.10

2008-10-26 Thread Alexander Dunlap
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:36 AM, John Lato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and > it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain > cases. With the following simple test: > >> import qualified Data.ByteS

[Haskell-cafe] performance difference for binary-0.4.3.1 with ghc-6.8.3 and ghc-6.10

2008-10-26 Thread John Lato
Hello, I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain cases. With the following simple test: > import qualified Data.ByteString.Lazy as L > import Data.Binary > import Data.Binary.Get > import Control.Mo