jwlato:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Alexander Dunlap
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:36 AM, John Lato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
> >> it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has marked
jwlato:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > jwlato:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
> >> it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
> >> cases. With the following simple
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:40:48AM +0700, Donald Halomoan wrote:
> Where can I get ghc-6.10? I cannot see it at haskell.org website.
No releases from the 6.10 branch have been made yet.
Thanks
Ian
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.or
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jwlato:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
>> it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
>> cases. With the following simple test:
>>
>> > import
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Where can I get ghc-6.10? I cannot see it at haskell.org website.
On 2008-10-29, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jwlato:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
>> it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
>> cases
jwlato:
> Hello,
>
> I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
> it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
> cases. With the following simple test:
>
> > import qualified Data.ByteString.Lazy as L
> > import Data.Binary
> > import Data.Bina
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Alexander Dunlap
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:36 AM, John Lato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
>> it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance i
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:36 AM, John Lato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
> it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
> cases. With the following simple test:
>
>> import qualified Data.ByteS
Hello,
I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
cases. With the following simple test:
> import qualified Data.ByteString.Lazy as L
> import Data.Binary
> import Data.Binary.Get
> import Control.Mo
10 matches
Mail list logo