2008/10/1 Jason Dagit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> noteed:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of the
>> > X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to them
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> noteed:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of the
> > X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to them
> > (to isolate Configuration data and dynamic data and
On 2008 Sep 30, at 17:59, Derek Elkins wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 13:20 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
noteed:
I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of
the
X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to
them
(to isolate Configuration data and dynamic d
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 13:20 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> noteed:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of the
> > X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to them
> > (to isolate Configuration data and dynamic data and glue them together
noteed:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of the
> X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to them
> (to isolate Configuration data and dynamic data and glue them together
> with IO). Are you happy of it, did it make things easier or not
Hi,
I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of the
X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to them
(to isolate Configuration data and dynamic data and glue them together
with IO). Are you happy of it, did it make things easier or not, would
you do it ag