2008/10/1 Jason Dagit [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
noteed:
Hi,
I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of the
X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to them
(to isolate
Hi,
I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of the
X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to them
(to isolate Configuration data and dynamic data and glue them together
with IO). Are you happy of it, did it make things easier or not, would
you do it
noteed:
Hi,
I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of the
X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to them
(to isolate Configuration data and dynamic data and glue them together
with IO). Are you happy of it, did it make things easier or not,
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 13:20 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
noteed:
Hi,
I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of the
X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to them
(to isolate Configuration data and dynamic data and glue them together
with
On 2008 Sep 30, at 17:59, Derek Elkins wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 13:20 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
noteed:
I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of
the
X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to
them
(to isolate Configuration data and dynamic
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
noteed:
Hi,
I'd like to know, now that time got by a bit, what the writers of the
X monad think about the use of the ReaderT/WriterT/IO brought to them
(to isolate Configuration data and dynamic data and glue them
