Hello Gabriel,
Tuesday, August 15, 2006, 10:36:28 PM, you wrote:
| Moreover, Haskell type classes supports inheritance. Run-time
| polymorphism together with inheritance are often seen as OOP
| distinctive points, so during long time i considered type classes as a
| form of OOP
Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hello Gabriel,
|
| Tuesday, August 15, 2006, 10:36:28 PM, you wrote:
|
| | Moreover, Haskell type classes supports inheritance. Run-time
| | polymorphism together with inheritance are often seen as OOP
| | distinctive points, so during long time i
Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| Moreover, Haskell type classes supports inheritance. Run-time
| polymorphism together with inheritance are often seen as OOP
| distinctive points, so during long time i considered type classes as a
| form of OOP implementation. but that's wrong!
Hello haskell,
i'm started to write article about type classes. can you, type gurus,
please check this initial text for correctness in explaining
differences between classes and type classes?
at this moment C++/C#/Java languages has classes and
templates/generics. what is a difference? with a
