On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Henning Thielemann wrote:
I think I now have general Applicative functionality ...
I hope the following is a proper Monad implementation. In contrast to
Applicative a Writer for sequencing actions does no longer work, instead I
need a State monad.
newtype LazyIO a =
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2009 Jan 1, at 16:44, Henning Thielemann wrote:
If it is generally possible to use unsafeInterleaveIO such that it
executes actions in the right order, wouldn't this allow the definition
of a general lazy IO monad?
I thought
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2009 Jan 1, at 16:44, Henning Thielemann wrote:
If it is generally possible to use unsafeInterleaveIO such that it
executes actions in the right order, wouldn't this allow the definition
of
I think I have a very similar problem to the currently discussed
WriterT [w] IO is not lazy in reading [w].
I want to defer IO actions, until they are needed, but they shall be
executed in order. If I call unsafeInterleaveIO, they can be executed in
any order. I understand that hGetContents does
On 2009 Jan 1, at 16:44, Henning Thielemann wrote:
If it is generally possible to use unsafeInterleaveIO such that it
executes actions in the right order, wouldn't this allow the
definition
of a general lazy IO monad?
I thought unsafeInterleaveIO and users of it (readFile, hGetContents)
