RE: Bug? [was: Implicit params]

2002-11-18 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Now fixed in the HEAD, and will be in 5.04.2 Thanks for pointing it out. Simon | -Original Message- | From: Jorge Adriano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: 14 November 2002 21:10 | To: Iavor S. Diatchki | Cc: Haskell Cafe; [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Bug? [was: Implicit params

Re: Bug? [was: Implicit params]

2002-11-18 Thread Jorge Adriano
Now fixed in the HEAD, and will be in 5.04.2 Thanks for pointing it out. Simon Thanks :) J.A. ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

RE: Bug? [was: Implicit params]

2002-11-15 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| this seems like a bug in GHC. Hugs is happy with it. The s in the | pure2 signature is not ambiguous because it is determined when you give | the value of the implicit parameter. in fact the way i think about | implicit parameters is simply as a nice notation for computations in the |

Bug? [was: Implicit params]

2002-11-14 Thread Jorge Adriano
On Thursday 14 November 2002 18:47, Iavor S. Diatchki wrote: hello, Well, actually you must be right since the pure field defines a pure (projection) function... Hmmm, ok, can someone explain this to me, data E s = E{ refi :: STRef s Int, refc :: STRef s Char, m