On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 15:54:47 -0500
Thaddeus L. Olczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while ago I looked at Haskell. I got stuck on a problem which
basically caused me to stop using Haskell.
Realising that I never asked anyone else how they would approach the
deal, I decided to ask before I put
A while ago I looked at Haskell. I got stuck on a problem which
basically caused me to stop using Haskell.
Realising that I never asked anyone else how they would approach the
deal, I decided to ask before I put the final chapter on Haskell.
I have a program that requires a lot of customisation.
On Sunday, July 13, 2003, at 06:54 AM, Thaddeus L. Olczyk wrote:
A while ago I looked at Haskell. I got stuck on a problem which
basically caused me to stop using Haskell.
Realising that I never asked anyone else how they would approach the
deal, I decided to ask before I put the final chapter on
G'day all.
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 10:09:21AM +1000, Andrew Rock wrote:
I think that each being a customisation *is* sufficient for coherence
of one data structure to hold them all.
I agree, though using different data structures for each set of
configuration parameters which will be used
