Re: Instance checking and phantom types

2003-09-15 Thread Sven Panne
Nick Name wrote: Hi all, I have an example wich I don't understand: First of all, let's rename the constructors and types a bit to make things clearer add the instance in question, and remove the type signatures: module Main where

Re: Instance checking and phantom types

2003-09-15 Thread Sven Panne
Nick Name wrote: Got it ;) Thanks for prompt reply. What does should always be explicit mean? Is there a notion of explicit context that I should know? What I meant was the fact that you always have to write down *all* contexts involved in a type signature. Nothing is inherited under the hood by