Jeff Newbern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for your input. I am mainly interested in this functionality to
> enhance my unit tests. I want to be able to run test cases with limits
> on time, heap, stack, etc. and fail the test if it exceeds the limits.
Well, if you can isolate the tests
Andreas Bauer wrote:
> > I would really like to be able to set resource limits on a per-function
> > basis. I am envisioning something like:
> >
> > limit :: l -> (a -> b) -> (a -> Maybe b)
> > limit lim fn = ...
> >
> > which would convert a function so that it returns Nothing if a limit
> >
Alastair,
Thanks for your input. I am mainly interested in this functionality to
enhance my unit tests. I want to be able to run test cases with limits
on time, heap, stack, etc. and fail the test if it exceeds the limits.
I think for this application it is acceptable for limit to introduce
a st
> I would really like to be able to set resource limits on a per-function
> basis. I am envisioning something like:
>
> limit :: l -> (a -> b) -> (a -> Maybe b)
> limit lim fn = ...
>
> which would convert a function so that it returns Nothing if a limit
> (on stack, heap, time, etc.) is exceeded
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 10:07:05PM +1000, Jeff Newbern wrote:
> I would really like to be able to set resource limits on a per-function
> basis. I am envisioning something like:
>
> limit :: l -> (a -> b) -> (a -> Maybe b)
> limit lim fn = ...
>
> which would convert a function so that it retur
Hi all,
I would really like to be able to set resource limits on a per-function
basis. I am envisioning something like:
limit :: l -> (a -> b) -> (a -> Maybe b)
limit lim fn = ...
which would convert a function so that it returns Nothing if a limit
(on stack, heap, time, etc.) is exceeded durin
