"Peter Verswyvelen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, it's a good habit in Haskell to move the "most important" parameter to
> the end of the argument list. See e.g.
> http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Parameter_order.
I must say I like these recommendations. As for the Data.Map examples,
th
Ahh ok I see what is meant by the parameter order
-Original Message-
From: Peter Verswyvelen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Peter Verswyvelen
Sent: 03 January 2008 12:02
To: Nicholls, Mark
Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Subject: RE: [Haskell-cafe] Is there anyone out there who
Hi Mark,
>> "foo1 :: Int -> obj -> String"
> Yep...I think that's what I'd dothough I would have done...
> "foo1 :: obj -> Int -> String"
> Does that matter?
Well, it's a good habit in Haskell to move the "most important" parameter to
the end of the argument list. See e.g.
http://www.haskell.
29
To: Nicholls, Mark
Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is there anyone out there who can translate
C# generics into Haskell?
Hello Mark,
Wednesday, January 2, 2008, 7:40:31 PM, you wrote:
> I'm trying to translate some standard C# constucts into Haskell...
some
it's
[snip]
>-- C#: interface IX1 { String foo1(int); }
>class IX1 obj where
> foo1 :: Int -> obj -> String
Yep...I think that's what I'd dothough I would have done...
"foo1 :: obj -> Int -> String"
Does that matter?
>-- C#: interface IX2 { String foo2(A); }
>class IX2 obj a where
> foo2
anyone out there who can translate
C# generics into Haskell?
Of course it depends what's inside the braces, and what you want to do
with it, but I'd be inclined to do something like this:
1) data IX a = IX { constructor :: Int -> a, ... }
2) data IX a b = IX { constructor :: I
Hello Mark,
Wednesday, January 2, 2008, 7:40:31 PM, you wrote:
> I'm trying to translate some standard C# constucts into Haskell... some
it's meaningless. read http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/OOP_vs_type_classes
and especially papers mentioned in the References
--
Best regards,
Bulat
Of course it depends what's inside the braces, and what you want to do with
it, but I'd be inclined to do something like this:
1) data IX a = IX { constructor :: Int -> a, ... }
2) data IX a b = IX { constructor :: Int -> b, func :: a -> b, ... }
3) data IX a b = IX { iy :: IY a, ... }
4) data IX
