On 07 September 2005 16:04, Dinh Tien Tuan Anh wrote:
> So is there a way to reuse thread ?
> I think eventhough threads in GHC are extremely lighweight, it still
> make a different if u keep launching and killing thread in so many
> times.
My advice would be to try without a thread pool first,
So is there a way to reuse thread ?
I think eventhough threads in GHC are extremely lighweight, it still make a
different if u keep launching and killing thread in so many times.
TuanAnh
Yes, but AFAIK, threads in Haskell are exceedingly lightweight, as
they are only primitives for concurre
performance by getting of the overhead of creating new thread.
>
> TuanAnh
>
> >From: genneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Dinh Tien Tuan Anh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
> >Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Thread pool in GHC
> >
repeated for an infinite times, so thread reuse would improve the
performance by getting of the overhead of creating new thread.
TuanAnh
From: genneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dinh Tien Tuan Anh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Thread
I think it would go back to the pool. The finally clause means that
even if the thread dies from an exception (which, AFAIK, is how kills
are modelled), the thread count would be restored.
Gen
On 9/6/05, Dinh Tien Tuan Anh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Its probably too long to bring back this t
Its probably too long to bring back this topic, but i have a small question.
If some threads may never terminate and have to be killed by killThread, are
they going back to the pool, or we need some twist to force them.
Thanks a lot
TuanAnh
From: genneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: haskell-cafe
