From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald Bruce Stewart)
To: Branimir Maksimovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] x86 code generation going wrong?
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:15:51 +1100
bmaxa:
>
>
>
bmaxa:
>
>
>
> >From: Chris Kuklewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Haskell Cafe
> >Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] x86 code generation going wrong?
> >Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:33:57 +
> >
> >Brian Sniffen wrote:
> >
From: Chris Kuklewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Haskell Cafe
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] x86 code generation going wrong?
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:33:57 +
Brian Sniffen wrote:
> The first couldn't even complete on my 2.26 GHz Celeron! It's only
Brian Sniffen wrote:
> The first couldn't even complete on my 2.26 GHz Celeron! It's only got
> 512 MB of RAM, which may be part of the problem.
I should not leak memory but it may be an optimization problem.
Try explicitly using "ghc -O2 -funbox-strict-fields".
>
> Stack space overflow: curre
From: Chris Kuklewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Subject: [Haskell-cafe] x86 code generation going wrong?
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:18:59 +
Hello,
I need to ask for some help to test x86 code generation.
There is a factor of two runtime difference between the cod
