It often seems to me that the Wildeian dichotomy of "charming" vs.
"tedious" applies especially well to programming languages.
On Oct 12, 2006, at 5:02 PM, mvanier wrote:
I prefer the terms "awesome" and "crappy", respectively, but sure,
whatever works for you ;-)
Mike
--
I prefer the terms "awesome" and "crappy", respectively, but sure, whatever
works for you ;-)
Mike
Henning Thielemann wrote:
Here is another approach of questionable classification of languages. :-)
A lazy functional program is demand driven, an imperative program is
supply driven. That is,
Henning Thielemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is another approach of questionable classification of languages. :-)
>
> A lazy functional program is demand driven, an imperative program is
> supply driven.
> So is Haskell a Keynesian language and C++ a Say language?
Great, now we can t
This is certainly proof that you can abuse economics in any context!
;) Or perhaps that economics can be used to abuse anything...
- Johan Tibell
On 10/12/06, Henning Thielemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is another approach of questionable classification of languages. :-)
A lazy functi
