On Aug 4, 2007, at 11:48 , Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Brandon,
Saturday, August 4, 2007, 7:27:16 PM, you wrote:
On Aug 4, 2007, at 11:19 , Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
and use it. want to assign a=b/(c+d)? nothing can be easier! just
define one more macro!
And? Everything above machine co
Hello Claus,
Saturday, August 4, 2007, 7:55:18 PM, you wrote:
>>> so, there could be a library defining
>>
>>> lhs ==: rhs = putMVar <$> lhs <*> rhs
> the lifted operations combine as the unlifted ones do. so there's
> one definition each for =, /, +, not one definition for each of
> their
Hello Brandon,
Saturday, August 4, 2007, 7:27:16 PM, you wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2007, at 11:19 , Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
>> and use it. want to assign a=b/(c+d)? nothing can be easier! just
>> define one more macro!
> And? Everything above machine code is just "macros" at various
> levels of abst
