Re[2]: [Haskell] Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-07 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Simon, Thursday, May 7, 2009, 2:04:05 PM, you wrote: I've heard it's hard to contain a long-running Haskell application in a finite amount of memory not exactly. you may alloc fixed pool of memory to application (say, 1gb) if you know that it never need more memory. but as far as you

Re[2]: [Haskell] Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-07 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Simon, Thursday, May 7, 2009, 5:45:53 PM, you wrote: out of date and say 256k, I've just fixed that). The old generation is allowed to grow to 2x its previous size by default before being collected. you are right. i just checked old logs - seems that previously i just misinterpreted

Re[2]: [Haskell] Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-07 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Simon, Thursday, May 7, 2009, 6:58:02 PM, you wrote: and completely separate topic - +RTS -s report description also doesn't exist Scroll down in that section I linked to before: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/runtime-control.html#rts-options-gc you are

Re: Re[2]: [Haskell] Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Is Haskell a Good Choice for Web Applications? (ANN: Vocabulink)

2009-05-07 Thread Jason Dagit
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Simon, Thursday, May 7, 2009, 6:58:02 PM, you wrote: and completely separate topic - +RTS -s report description also doesn't exist Scroll down in that section I linked to before: