Hi Bulat,
I wrote:
One is the confusion caused by the strange semantics
to those not familiar with the theory...
Like me, of course.
The other is awkwardness in extending the capabilites
of ST. For that, I would propose that the function "unsafeRunST"
be added to the library.
Bulat Zigansh
Hello Yitzchak,
Thursday, January 4, 2007, 12:25:41 PM, you wrote:
> The other is awkwardness in extending the capabilites
> of ST. For that, I would propose that the function "unsafeRunST"
> be added to the library.
this function exists, but named unsafeIOtoST. IO and ST is exactly the same
thi
