Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell & monads for newbies (was "Functional dependencies *not* part of the next Haskell standard?")

2007-07-12 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello peterv, Thursday, July 12, 2007, 6:01:43 PM, you wrote: > Monads were very confusing because I first looked at Concurrent Clean (it > comes with an IDE and games! :), and that language uses a simple "uniqueness > typing" approach where the "world" or "state" is explicitly passed as an > obj

Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell & monads for newbies (was "Functional dependencies *not* part of the next Haskell standard?")

2007-07-13 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello peterv, Thursday, July 12, 2007, 6:01:43 PM, you wrote: > Haskell or typically N times shorter than their imp/OO counterparts, it > would take *me* at least N^2 longer to write them ;) (now I must admit I had > the same feeling when switching from 680x0 assembler to C++, but let's say > N*2