Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Why Not Haskell?

2006-08-05 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Bjorn, Saturday, August 5, 2006, 6:59:33 PM, you wrote: yes, thank you >>> 2) Input and output are not good enough, in particular for graphical >>> user interfacing and/or data base interaction. But it seems there are >>> several user interfaces and SQL and other data base interfaces for >

Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Why Not Haskell?

2006-08-05 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Kaveh, Saturday, August 5, 2006, 10:16:06 AM, you wrote: > 1 - monads : there must be something to make a clear tool for a > none-mathematician programmer. (I still have understanding problems > with them). http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/IO_inside and "All about monads" > 2 - there must b

Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Why Not Haskell?

2006-08-04 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Jason, Friday, August 4, 2006, 10:01:31 PM, you wrote: > 15. OO is now tried and true in industry. I would say it's far from > optimal but people do know they can build large applications (say > ~100k lines of C++). it's medium size. GHC is larger :) -- Best regards, Bulat