Hello Don,
Friday, November 27, 2009, 11:08:44 PM, you wrote:
it's just false assumption that you should got speed comparable to
other languages. haskell is lazy and ghc has much less mature compiler
comparable to other languages eh?
That seems a little too broad to be meaningful, Bulat, as
Hi Bulat
hmm ok I understand the issue of compiler maturity. But I thought
lazyness was meant to be a bonus? Or is it that if you really try to squeeze
performance it becomes more of a hindrance?
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Bulat Ziganshin
bulat.zigans...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello Don,
On Nov 27, 2009, at 23:18 , vishnu wrote:
hmm ok I understand the issue of compiler maturity. But I thought
lazyness was meant to be a bonus? Or is it that if you really try to
squeeze performance it becomes more of a hindrance?
If you're trying to eke out every last bit of performance,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:18 PM, vishnu path...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bulat
hmm ok I understand the issue of compiler maturity. But I thought
lazyness was meant to be a bonus? Or is it that if you really try to squeeze
performance it becomes more of a hindrance?
One of my favorite quotes by
