Hello Paul, Thursday, July 5, 2007, 8:07:34 PM, you wrote:
> note: with Python, I'm used to 3rd party modules being available as > Windows installer packages - does the concept of an installable binary > for something like MissingH, which I can just install and use, make > sense for a compiled language like Haskell? The build, find I'm all cabalized libraries are installed using the same commands: runghc setup.hs configure runghc setup.hs build runghc setup.hs install after this, you just "import" modules you need in your program and when you build your program, ghc automatically links in all the library functions you used > As I mentioned in passing, it may well be that the library issue with > Haskell is more of a perception (or maybe organisational) issue than a > technical one... the problem exists and for me, it's most important Haskell insfrastructure problem. but things you are mentioned are already implemented i personally implemented several libs required for my own program; and still miss ease-to-use and maintained GUI library -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
