Re[4]: [Haskell-cafe] Re: How Can Haskell Be Saved?

2009-12-14 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Erik, Monday, December 14, 2009, 1:02:58 PM, you wrote: >> POSIX is a *subsystem*. you are using Win32 subsystem. There is also > Please enlighten me. How do I access the POSIX subsystem? i don't know since i never tried. it seems that this is bad idea. if you really need it, it should be

Re[4]: [Haskell-cafe] Re: How Can Haskell Be Saved?

2009-12-14 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Duncan, Monday, December 14, 2009, 1:33:14 PM, you wrote: >> Please enlighten me. How do I access the POSIX subsystem? > I'm not sure of all the details, but the program ends up getting linked > differently. The GNU ld user guide says: yes, it should be linked to other dlls. the catch is

Fwd: Re[4]: [Haskell-cafe] Re: How Can Haskell Be Saved?

2009-12-14 Thread Alberto G. Corona
> > POSIX subsystem was implemented by MS (and other major players) only > to meet some bureaucratic reqs from DoD/UsGov, and i don't know any > program really using it. just don't mix C library emulation of POSIX > calls on top of Win32 with POSIX subsystem (btw, both are implemented > on top of n

Re: Re[4]: [Haskell-cafe] Re: How Can Haskell Be Saved?

2009-12-14 Thread Richard O'Keefe
On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:16 PM, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: POSIX subsystem was implemented by MS (and other major players) only to meet some bureaucratic reqs from DoD/UsGov, and i don't know any program really using it. There are two separate things being confused here, maybe three. (0) "POSIX" fu