Hello Sebastian,
Sunday, February 22, 2009, 2:55:38 AM, you wrote:
yes, you are right. Don also compared results of 64x-reduced
computation with full one. are you think that these results are more
fair?
Yes. Clearly so.
It still computes the result from scratch - it just uses a trick
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello Sebastian,
Sunday, February 22, 2009, 2:55:38 AM, you wrote:
yes, you are right. Don also compared results of 64x-reduced
computation with full one. are you think that these results are more
Hello Louis,
Sunday, February 22, 2009, 2:59:05 AM, you wrote:
Sebastian, that's not Bulat's point. He's saying that if we make
that optimization in Haskell, we should at least make the same
optimization in GCC for fair comparison. (Though I'm not entirely
sure that that optimization would
Bulat,
Thank you for being productive. =)
of course these results are useful! my own goal was just to make fair
comparison. i'm bothered when people said that ghc should be used
for something like video codecs based on those let's optimize only
for haskell pseudo-benchmarks. if Don was omitted
