Re: Status of Haskell Platform 2014.2.0.0

Well done! On Wednesday, 9 July 2014, Mark Lentczner wrote: > The status is: *Good-to-Go!* > > The new-build branch of Haskell Platform is in pretty great shape: > >- One consistent build system using Shake >- Builds source tarball >- Builds linux distribution tarball >- Builds M

Re: HP 2013 packages shaping up...

It seems like a pity to drop OpenGL after we've had it for so many years and got it on every system ... I haven't seen a proposal to remove it though (unless I missed something)... On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Brent Yorgey wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 10:18:14AM -0800, Mark Lentczner wro

Release went well !

http://lambda.galois.com/mrtg/localhost_2-day.png :) -- Don Sent from phone ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform

Re: [Haskell] Haskell Platform Release

We're converging on the date - discussion and planning on the Haskell-platform list. Cheers, Don On Sunday, May 13, 2012, Dominic Steinitz wrote: > Hi, > > The release timetable http://trac.haskell.org/**haskell-platform/wiki/** > ReleaseTimetable

Re: package versions for 2012.2.0.0

That's all you need to do - but it might not happen for this release. On Monday, May 7, 2012, Jason Dagit wrote: > > > On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Don Stewart > > > wrote: > >> Thanks Mark. >> >> Some comments: >> >> * random: yep,

Re: package versions for 2012.2.0.0

That's all you need to do - but it might not happen for this release. On Monday, May 7, 2012, Jason Dagit wrote: > > > On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Don Stewart > > > wrote: > >> Thanks Mark. >> >> Some comments: >> >> * random: yep,

Re: package versions for 2012.2.0.0

Thanks Mark. Some comments: * random: yep, we just move it into the library set. * deepseq is in the list of supported libs, so we just have to make sure it is on every system - if it comes with ghc that's ok. * integer-* aren't parts of the platform, so we don't explicitly require them (same wit

Announce: The Haskell Platform 2011.4

We're pleased to announce the release of the Haskell Platform: a single, standard Haskell distribution for everyone. Download the Haskell Platform 2011.4.0.0: http://haskell.org/platform/ The specification, along with installers (including Windows, Apple and Unix installers for a full Haskel

we're live!

http://hackage.haskell.org/platform/ Thanks again massively to Mark and Mikhail for so much help! ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform

Ready to go!

http://code.haskell.org/haskell-platform/download-website/linux.html Test and report back. No problems? I'll push the .html live at 4pm EST. ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mail

Re: [haskell-infrastructure] Access to lambda for Mark Lenczner

I'll take care of these. Good work, Mark! On Saturday, December 17, 2011, Mark Lentczner wrote: > I've created the new /platform tree on lambda. 2011.4.0.0 things are now in that tree. > I moved the 2011.2.0.0 doc into the new tree, and symlinked to it from the old so that the current links will

Re: Setting a timetable

If you can hold on, I can roll this on Saturday... There's release instructions in the how to doc in the repo, if you can't wait. Theres not too much fiddly stuff, but it is important to make sure the big files end up on lambda On Wednesday, December 14, 2011, Mark Lentczner wrote: > Currently

Re: Setting a timetable

Good work. I'm on vacation till next week, but will be around to do website and testing after the 13th On Sunday, December 4, 2011, Mark Lentczner wrote: > I have 2011.4.0.0 release candidates for Mac OS X up on my site: > > http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/platform/ > > It runs on 10.6 and 10.7.

Re: Setting a timetable

Thanks. This is helpful. I'll put together the release schedule this evening. Aiming for weekend after next On Monday, November 14, 2011, Duncan Coutts wrote: > On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 14:46 -0500, Don Stewart wrote: >> Ok. > > Don, thanks for jumping in. I tried a month back

Re: Setting a timetable

Ok. Then the question is: which compiler is GHC HQ blessing as stable at this point. GHC 7.0.4 looks like the best bet. -- Don On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov < the.dead.shall.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Mark Lentczner > wrote: > > I ca

Setting a timetable

Hey guys, I've updated the HP website to point out that there is no release in July. I've been somewhat out of the discussion about the new release -- what's the consensus for * what to release? * when to release it? I'll be able to help get this release out up until Nov 27th, if we do an updat

Re: Setting a timetable

2011.$odd is always the in-between release versions, so its either a minor rev (e.g. 2011.2.0.2 if we don't upgrade the compiler beyond 7.0.x series), or 2011.4.0.0, if we do a major bump.y http://trac.haskell.org/haskell-platform/wiki/VersionNumbers#Thegeneralschemeforstablereleases On Sat, Nov

Re: Plans for next release

How about a thanksgiving release day? On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Mark Lentczner wrote: > So, here it is end of October. What did we decide to do? What are we > going to do? :-) > > - Mark > > ___ > Haskell-platform mailing list > Haskell-platfo

Re: Plans for next release

I think we stick to the stable release plan. On Monday, September 5, 2011, Duncan Coutts wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to solicit opinions on what we should do for our next HP > release. > > The main issue is GHC. We have GHC 7.2.1 out now, but it's fairly widely > agreed that it is not ready for

Re: Haskell Platform is Now Available for FreeBSD

Great! I've updated the download page with the link: http://hackage.haskell.org/platform/linux.html Well done! 2011/5/14 PÁLI Gábor János : >  Hello there, > > For your information, a port for Haskell Platform [1] has just been > added to the FreeBSD Ports Collection.  Note that there is n

Some nice praise

"pht 9 hours ago | link I've been tooling around with Haskell for a few months now, and since the beginning I've been impressed with the incredible amount of polish that goes into the official distribution. Maybe my expectations of an 'academic', FP language were low, but the clean, navigable desi

HP 2011.2.0.1 is out

http://hackage.haskell.org/platform/ Thanks everyone! ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform

Release candidates all ready

http://lambda.haskell.org/hp-tmp/2011.2.0.1/ Test! Especially XCode 4 users. ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform

Re: release candidate installers for 2011.2.0.1 on Mac OS X

Woo!!! OK. I'll push things up to the site tomorrow. Good work, Mark! On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Mark Lentczner wrote: > There are release candidate installers for Mac OS X 10.6 here: > > >  http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/hp/Haskell%20Platform%202011.2.0.1-i386-rc1.pkg > >  http://www.oz

Fwd: [Haskell-cafe] Experimental 64 bit installer fails

-- Forwarded message -- From: Andrew Pennebaker Date: Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:01 PM Subject: [Haskell-cafe] Experimental 64 bit installer fails To: Haskell Cafe I downloaded the experimental 64 bit installer for from Haskell Platform. It fails with the message "The installation f

Re: where I'm stuck building a 7.0.3 HP

I'm ok. On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Mark Lentczner wrote: > I'm trying to fix ticket #169 - Haskell Platform 2011-2.0.0: parsec docs > contain broken HTML links before rebuilding 7.0.3 > The problem stems from the build.sh script where packages are built with a > faux package database gener

Re: Windows installer 2011.2.0.1 RC1

Thanks!! Good work! On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi all, > > I've uploaded the first RC of the 2011.2.0.1 Windows installer to > > http://dissocial.st:8000/HaskellPlatform-2011.2.0.1-rc1-setup.exe > > Please test and yell loudly if any bugs are encountered. > > -- >

Minor rev of HP for GHC 7.0.3

A candidate minor revision of the Haskell Platform to 2011.2.0.1 is available for testing and installer building: * Updates GHC to 7.0.3 * Updates (minor) text to 0.11.0.6 Source installer: http://lambda.haskell.org/hp-tmp/2011.2.0.1/ Cabal spec: http://code.galois.com/darcs/haskell-platform/h

Minor rev to include GHC 7.0.3

Hey all, (Back from vacation). With GHC 7.0.3 out, and fixing many important bugs (such as Mac support wrt. XCode 4, split objs on Mac, and correct doc installers for Windows, I propose we have a minor release in the next week. I have a tentative release schedule planned here: * http://trac.ha

ANNOUNCE: Haskell Platform 2011.2 released!

We're pleased to announce the 2011.2 release of the Haskell Platform: a single, standard Haskell distribution for everyone. Download the Haskell Platform 2011.2.0.0: http://haskell.org/platform/ The specification, along with installers (including Windows, Apple and Unix installers for a full

ETA 15 mins

Just syncing the site now. Then we should be live. Thank you to everyone who helped, the testers, and especially Mark and Mikhail for rolling such great installers!! -- Don ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://

Almost there

Final installers are now up. Windows: http://lambda.haskell.org/hp-tmp/2011.2.0.0-rc/HaskellPlatform-2011.2.0.0-rc3-setup.exe Mac: http://lambda.haskell.org/hp-tmp/2011.2.0.0-rc/Haskell%20Platform%202011.2.0.0-i386-rc4.pkg Mac 64 bit: http://lambda.haskell.org/hp-tmp/2011.2.0.0-rc/Haske

Re: Go go go!

Well spotted. Fixed. trebla: > A small bug in scripts/build.sh (has been there in previous versions): > > # Actually do something! > for pkg in `cat packages/platform.packages`; do > if is_pkg_installed "${pkg}"; then > true > else > echo '*

Re: Go go go!

Uploaded: http://lambda.galois.com/hp-tmp/2011.2.0.0-rc/ Mikhail, what's your expected date? -- Don On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Mark Lentczner wrote: > I built new release candidate installers for Mac OS X 10.6 and am > uploading here: > >   > http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/hp/Haskell%

Go go go!

New cabal-install release, with the release stopper bugs gone. The .cabal spec is updated and in darcs: http://code.galois.com/darcs/haskell-platform/ And a new RC for the src installer is up on lambda.haskell.org: http://lambda.galois.com/hp-tmp/2011.2.0.0-rc/ Send me your new installers :-)

Re: Version bump of cabal-install

way the cabal crumbles... > > I'll be able to reroll Mac installers to night (PST) . > > -Mark > On Tuesday, March 8, 2011, Don Stewart wrote: >> Testing on the RCs revealed a bug in cabal-install that would cause >> assertion failures at "cabal configure"

Version bump of cabal-install

Testing on the RCs revealed a bug in cabal-install that would cause assertion failures at "cabal configure" time. Several users reported this error. Duncan's agreed to release a new cabal-install minor rev, fixing this bug (and one other one). This will entail a bump to the version of cabal-instal

Re: Candidate Mac Installer page

Yes. On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Wilson MacGyver wrote: > so by default for OSX user, 32bit option is still the recommended path > for the time being? > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Don Stewart wrote: >> http://code.galois.com/darcs/haskell-platform/downloa

Candidate Mac Installer page

http://code.galois.com/darcs/haskell-platform/download-website/mac.html Thoughts? Thanks to Mark for the nice text about Xcode. ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Status of Mac 64 bit GHC

Thanks Gregory! That's very helpful. I'll update the HP release page, moving the 64 bit version down the page, and clearly labelling it. -- Don On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Gregory Wright wrote: > On 3/7/11 1:41 PM, Don Stewart wrote: >> >> Hey guys, >> &

Status of Mac 64 bit GHC

Hey guys, Talking to Simon Marlow, he's suspicious that the 64 bit GHC for Mac isn't fully working yet. In particular, GHCi isn't working? Can someone confirm / deny GHC 7.0.2 64 bit Mac support is there? What is its state? If e.g. GHCi isn't workng, we better mark it as "experimental, try at yo

Re: 2011.2.0.0 Mac Installers: RC2

Uploaded. the.dead.shall.rise: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Don Stewart wrote: > > Available from the haskell.org staging area: > > > >    http://lambda.galois.com/hp-tmp/2011.2.0.0-rc/ > > Can you also upload the updated Windows installer the

Re: 2011.2.0.0 Mac Installers: RC2

Available from the haskell.org staging area: http://lambda.galois.com/hp-tmp/2011.2.0.0-rc/ On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Mark Lentczner wrote: > I build a second release candidate installer this weekend for Mac OS X 10.6: > >   > http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/hp/Haskell%20Platform%2020

Fwd: Installers ready for testing

Good report for the Windows installer. -- Forwarded message -- Hi Don, On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Don Stewart wrote: > Hosted at: > >  http://lambda.galois.com/hp-tmp/2011.2.0.0-rc/ > > Includes, for the first time, a 64 bit Mac installer from Mark. > I

Website up (testing only)

Candidate installer site. http://code.galois.com/darcs/haskell-platform/download-website/ Feedback. Installers are all hosted on lambda.haskell.org (md5sum here: http://lambda.galois.com/hp-tmp/2011.2.0.0-rc/md5sum.txt ) Might be time to roll torrents. __

Installers ready for testing

Hosted at: http://lambda.galois.com/hp-tmp/2011.2.0.0-rc/ Includes, for the first time, a 64 bit Mac installer from Mark. -- Don ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi

Windows and Source installers up for testing

http://www.galois.com/~dons/code/2011.2.0.0/ Please report any issues. Once we have the Mac installers, I'll flip the switch on the website. -- Don ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi

Re: Oops, version number off: should be 2011.2.0.0 now

Source installer: http://www.galois.com/~dons/code/2011.2.0.0/ On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Don Stewart wrote: > Updated the cabal file to reflect this is the stable release: 2011.2 > > -- Don > ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Hask

Oops, version number off: should be 2011.2.0.0 now

Updated the cabal file to reflect this is the stable release: 2011.2 -- Don ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform

Spec ready to go!

2011.1 ready to go! Darcs repo: * darcs get http://code.galois.com/darcs/haskell-platform/ Cabal spec: * http://code.galois.com/darcs/haskell-platform/haskell-platform.cabal Unix source installer: * http://www.galois.com/~dons/code/2011.1.0.0/haskell-platform-2011.1.0.0.tar.gz Mark,

GHC 7.0.2 out

Hey team, We're close to being done now, since GHC 7.0.2 is available: * http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell/2011-March/022610.html and there's an updated cabal-install on Hackage: * http://hackage.haskell.org/package/cabal-install-0.10.0 So time to tweak the spec for the platform, an

Re: Including cabal-install in the platform source tarball

The problem -- after I refreshed my memory -- isn't that cabal-install can't handle itself as a tool dep. It is that we need a new release of cabal-install to have a satisfiable package set in the HP in the first place. Current cabal-install depends on old containers, preventing everything from bui

Re: Pattern matching warnings

The HP release awaits the official GHC 7.0.2 Please let us know the approximate release date. -- Don On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > Dear Haskell Platform gurus > > > > Christian Maeder would like GHC’s lambda-pattern warning change merged into > the 7.0.2 GHC that

Candidate installers up. Feedback wanted

2011.1 with GHC 7.0.1 * Windows * Mac * Unix http://www.galois.com/~dons/code/ -- Don ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform

Test installers: Mac/ Unix

Two installers for testing, sans cabal-install. Both use Mark's new support for doc generation. * 32 bit Mac intel, http://www.galois.com/~dons/code/Haskell%20Platform%202011.1.pkg * Unix src, with haddocks, http://www.galois.com/~dons/code/haskell-platform-2011.1.0.0.tar.gz Testing welcome! -

Re: Release stopper: cabal-install depends on containers 0.3.0.0

Are you able to produce a candidate installer without cabal-install, so we can test the ghc 7 packaging? -- Don On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Don Stewart wrote: >> Currently cabal-install requires containe

Release stopper: cabal-install depends on containers 0.3.0.0

Currently cabal-install requires containers (≥0.1 & <0.4). We ship containers 0.4.x Duncan, HP release is blocked on a new cabal-install release. -- Don ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.or

New spring theme for 2011

http://code.galois.com/darcs/haskell-platform/download-website/ You may need to refresh. ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform

Testing results

I have successful builds of the Unix installer on * Arch Linux x86_64 * Ubuntu Maverick x86_64 (ec2 instance) Next up: Windows and Mac installers. -- Don ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell

Candidate spec and generic installer

I have a candidate .cabal file that builds with GHC 7.0.1, that could form the base of some 2011.1 (preview) release this weekend. * Cabal file: http://code.galois.com/darcs/haskell-platform/haskell-platform.cabal * Generic source installer: http://www.galois.com/~dons/c

Re: Preparing for the release

Thanks Christian! Yes, we will go to parsec-3: the maintainer has declared that is the appropriate steps for parsec: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2010-November/015047.html Getting containers updated for 7.0.2 would also be nice. -- Don On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Christia

Re: Where is the CABAL file for haskell-platform 2010.2.0.0?

petersen: > > I'm not sure I'm reading the release plan for 2011.x.0.0[1] correctly > > (Currently it is offline...) but my understanding is that > 2011.1.0.0 is a beta release currently based on ghc-7.0.1 > (ie what is currently in darcs), whereas 2011.2.0.0 will be a stable > release (based on g

Preparing for the release

Due to massive work overload, the HP 2011 initial release has been delayed a bit longer than I'd planned, however, with BayHac on this weekend, prepare for the specs to go up, and release candidate installers to go live. -- Don ___ Haskell-platform mail

Re: Licenses

markl: > I took a look at the licenses for the included projects. > > They are all, but one, BSD3-like, though there are several minor variants of > the actual license text. > > The exception is syb which is part BSD3, and two parts which are based on the > Haskell 98 report license. Hmm. Inte

Re: timeline?

Two dates stand out for me: 15th Dec: package freeze (will slip until the weekend, but that will be the final .cabal file) Jan early: announce of beta HP release. Then we need a date for the final release: Jan late. (last week) Aim to have an installer read by Jan 10, based

Re: random questions while packaging...

markl: > As I'm building the Mac OS X installer, some questions have arisen, > I'm hopting the Haskell-Platform team can answer: > > * Licenses: The installer shows the license file that came with the > GHC installer (BSD3 for the compiler, and LGPL for GMP lib). Do we > want/need to have any othe

Re: repos?

markl: > Folks - > > Is there a repo other than http://code.haskell.org/haskell-platform? > I'm looking to test the new Mac OS X installer packaging, and I was > hoping to do it against what our current approximation of > HP-2011.1.0.0 will be. The head of the repo above seems to be at > 2010.2.0

Re: bar

baz ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform

Re: Contribution vs quality, and a few notes on the Platform process

igloo: > > > > > > Steering committee, I think we need to resolve this question before we > > > can make progress. How should we proceed? > > > > What is the question? > > Should the HP attempt to provide: > > A set of packages that are popular and meet certain quality > standards > >

Re: haskell platform steering committee...

simonpj: > | >> About participation (and I've not been great myself), I think that if > | >> we have a round-robin system of assigning committee members to > | >> proposals then it'll help to prevent the problem that we each assume > > | > > | > Yes, that sounds like a good plan.  If a

Re: Contribution vs quality, and a few notes on the Platform process

igloo: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:18:37AM +, Simon Marlow wrote: > > > > This is moving in the opposite direction from what Ross suggests above - > > making the platform less of an aggregation mechanism and more of a > > single community project. Could it work? I'm not sure. Clearly Ro

Re: Contribution vs quality, and a few notes on the Platform process

igloo: > By the way, I see Don Stewart is now listed as a steering committee > member; was that announced somewhere? > Oh, that's an accident. I'm not on the committee. ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projec

Status update: HP 2011.x and GHC 7

I have built a very early candidate for the Haskell Platform 2011 set, ignoring any active proposals, using GHC 7. Issues that were raised: = Haskell Platform packages that have broken the HP policy, by adding new dependencies that are not part of the Haskell Platform set: * cgi (kno

Haskell Platform decision: time to bless parsec 3?

Hey all, This is a loose end in the package policy situation: when the HP has a major upgrade, the policy is to do all major upgrades for any packages contained in the HP, as long as they don't add new dependencies. One exception to this rule has been parsec, where parsec 2 was considered "blesse

Re: Seeking new maintainer for OSX binary installer

Given the discussion online about forming a Mac strike force, I'd also suggest putting this in that context, and asking on the libraries@ list for help. greg: > Hi all, > > Is anyone willing to take on maintenance of the OSX binary installer for > the Haskell Platform? > > Thanks, > > G > -- >

Haskell Platform Proposal: add the 'text' library

I have submitted a formal proposal to add 'text' to the HP, in time for the next major release. - Forwarded message from Don Stewart - Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:26:36 -0700 From: Don Stewart To: librar...@haskell.org Cc: Subject: Haskell Platform Proposal: add the 

Re: HP comments from the State of Haskell survey

dons: > cpatti: > > > > > > My goal is simply to get the 'generic tarball sources' to build, because > > that's > > what Homebrew consumes and what is currently breaking on a linker error. > > > > I've got a Mac ssh server now, so testing ... > I'm using the generic installer, $ ./confi

Re: HP comments from the State of Haskell survey

cpatti: > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Gregory Collins > wrote: > > Don Stewart writes: > > > cpatti: > >> > >>     So what patch does the binary installer have, that the generic > installer >

Re: HP comments from the State of Haskell survey

cpatti: > > So what patch does the binary installer have, that the generic installer > doesn't? > > Let me know. > > -- Don > > > I have no idea - the installer is a binary - are there sources for it around > somewhere? If so I or someone else with a contributor bit should get

Re: [haskell-platform] #138: Haskell platform for Mac OS X depends on non-standard perl install

This looks like an easy one to fix. haskell-platform: > #138: Haskell platform for Mac OS X depends on non-standard perl install > --+- > Reporter: dmp | Owner: dons > Type: defect| Status: new

Re: HP comments from the State of Haskell survey

cpatti: > > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Don Stewart wrote: > > wmacgyver: > > I have a stupid question. > > > > Does building ghc/haskell platform requires some special voodoo? > > > > Since the binary dist

Re: HP comments from the State of Haskell survey

wmacgyver: > I have a stupid question. > > Does building ghc/haskell platform requires some special voodoo? > > Since the binary distro for haskell platform clearly works for OSX. > > But why is it that both macports and homebrew seems to > never work like clockwork? > > I use macports for erla

Re: HP comments from the State of Haskell survey

cpatti: > > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Don Stewart wrote: > > The following comments about the Haskell Platform appeared in the > State of Haskell survey. > >    http://www.johantibell.com/files/state-of-haskell-2010.html > >    * I als

HP comments from the State of Haskell survey

The following comments about the Haskell Platform appeared in the State of Haskell survey. http://www.johantibell.com/files/state-of-haskell-2010.html * Apart from then Haskell Platform, software installation is a pain. Cabal install is bearable, if painful, for developers, but it is

ANNOUNCE: Haskell Platform 2010.2.0.0

We're pleased to announce the fifth release of the Haskell Platform: a single, standard Haskell distribution for everyone. Download the Haskell Platform 2010.2.0.0: http://hackage.haskell.org.nyud.net/platform/ (Caching server). The specification, along with installers (including Windows, A

Timeline for release

Hey release time, * We have installers (no complaints yet about the Mac installer) * We have torrents Assuming nothing bad is reported in the next 12 hours, I'll push the site live tomorrow, and we'll be in business. Thanks to the dedicated team of installer and torrent builders and testers :-

Re: HP 2010.2.0.0 OSX Installer RC1

greg: > Hi all, > > The first release candidate for the OSX installer is ready: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/platform/2010.2.0.0/haskell-platform-2010.2.0.0.rc1-i386.dmg > > This one was built on a Leopard system and shouldn't have any of the > problems the last one had re: OSX 10.5. > > OSX

Re: HP 2010.2.0.0 OSX Installer RC1

greg: > Hi all, > > The first release candidate for the OSX installer is ready: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/platform/2010.2.0.0/haskell-platform-2010.2.0.0.rc1-i386.dmg > > This one was built on a Leopard system and shouldn't have any of the > problems the last one had re: OSX 10.5. > > OSX

Re: RC status and release schedule

the.dead.shall.rise: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Don Stewart wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > >    * What's the status of the Windows Installer RC? Stable? > > Haven't heard any complaints. > Torrent is up, please seed: http://ha

Re: Mac OSX install OK -Intel Core Duo

Thanks for the detailed "OK"! -- Don crmills_2000: >Install went fine. I had several older GHC versions installed; but the > messages made it clear what I needed to remove. So I installed; uninstalled; > and > then installed GHC again. Then installed the platform. Then rebooted (I am > ge

Re: RC status and release schedule

the.dead.shall.rise: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Don Stewart wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > >    * What's the status of the Windows Installer RC? Stable? > > Haven't heard any complaints. > Great. I&

RC status and release schedule

Hey guys, * I think the Unix src installer is now ready to go. * What's the status of the Windows Installer RC? Stable? * Gregory Collins should have an RC for the Mac later today. * There's also a Solaris installer now. Once I see the Mac installer, I'll start the process of roll

Re: Haskell Platform 2010.2.0.0 RC and ghc 6.12.3 Solaris 10u8

Well done! markwright: > Hi, > > The Haskell Platform 2010.2.0.0 RC can be built from an RPM spec file > on Solaris 10u8, with ghc 6.12.3, as part of the Spec Files Extra project: > > http://pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/spec-files-extra/ > > No binary packages are available, no support, no warranty

Re: Initial environment check script

claus.reinke: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/haskell-platform-test-2010.2.0.0 > > > > Ideas for additional tests to add to this tool are welcome, as are > > patches. > > haskell-platform-test.cabal: > | Build-depends: > | .. .. > > Shouldn't that simply be haskell-platform-2010.

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Design for 2010.2.x series Haskell Platform site

dave: > > > > Actually, it just got trivial: > > > >    $ diffcabal old-platform.cabal haskell-platform.cabal > >    Cabal 1.8.0.2 -> 1.8.0.6 > >    QuickCheck 2.1.0.3 -> 2.1.1.1 > [etc.] > > Okay, so where do I go to find out the difference between, say, > QuickCheck 2.1.0.3 and 2.1.1.1? > > --

Re: Most popular libraries not in the HP

duncan.coutts: > On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 09:07 -0700, Don Stewart wrote: > > marlowsd: > > > On 15/07/2010 23:53, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > > >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Don Stewart > >> <mailto:d...@galois.com>> wrote: > > >

Best links for Haskell Platform distro packages?

Can distro maintainers confirm these are the best links for each distro package? Debian http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/haskell-platform (or should it be sid?) Fedora: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/haskell-platform Gentoo: http://

Initial environment check script

http://hackage.haskell.org/package/haskell-platform-test-2010.2.0.0 Ideas for additional tests to add to this tool are welcome, as are patches. ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/m

Re: Windows installer 2010.2.0.0 RC1

claus.reinke: > > 2. Is there a checklist for distro maintainers and release >candidate testers, about what to check? > I'm thinking of this as a package on hackage: cabal install haskell-platform-test which would only build if all tests pass. To start with, it would depend on every pa

Re: Windows installer 2010.2.0.0 RC1

claus.reinke: > > More generally: what is the status of establishing a > proper testing process for Haskell platform releases? > Currently we have an ad hoc process: * GHC people test and release as stable version * Package developers release new stable versions * We adopt the new p

  1   2   >