Chris Patti writes:
> So, the installer is installing a 32 bit executable.
>
> This at least makes sense now. Unfortunately, I do not understand
> enough about C code linking and 64 bit issues to fix the problem.
Any C libs that you depend on have to be built in either 32-bit or
universal mode.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Gregory Collins
wrote:
> Don Stewart writes:
>
> > So the generic installer seems to be working? Leopard/Mac/intel.
>
> Betcha it's a 64-bit issue on Snow Leopard then.
>
> G
> --
> Gregory Collins
>
Precisely. All the machines I tested on are running Snow Leo
Don Stewart writes:
> So the generic installer seems to be working? Leopard/Mac/intel.
Betcha it's a 64-bit issue on Snow Leopard then.
G
--
Gregory Collins
___
Haskell-platform mailing list
Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org
http://projects.has
dons:
> cpatti:
> >
> >
> > My goal is simply to get the 'generic tarball sources' to build, because
> > that's
> > what Homebrew consumes and what is currently breaking on a linker error.
> >
>
> I've got a Mac ssh server now, so testing ...
>
I'm using the generic installer,
$ ./confi
cpatti:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Gregory Collins
> wrote:
>
> Don Stewart writes:
>
> > cpatti:
> >>
> >> So what patch does the binary installer have, that the generic
> installer
> >> doesn't?
> >>
> >> Let me know.
> >>
> >>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Gregory Collins wrote:
> Don Stewart writes:
>
> > cpatti:
> >>
> >> So what patch does the binary installer have, that the generic
> installer
> >> doesn't?
> >>
> >> Let me know.
> >>
> >> -- Don
> >>
> >>
> >> I have no idea - the installer is a
Don Stewart writes:
> cpatti:
>>
>> So what patch does the binary installer have, that the generic installer
>> doesn't?
>>
>> Let me know.
>>
>> -- Don
>>
>>
>> I have no idea - the installer is a binary - are there sources for it around
>> somewhere? If so I or someone else
cpatti:
>
> So what patch does the binary installer have, that the generic installer
> doesn't?
>
> Let me know.
>
> -- Don
>
>
> I have no idea - the installer is a binary - are there sources for it around
> somewhere? If so I or someone else with a contributor bit should get
cpatti:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
>
> wmacgyver:
> > I have a stupid question.
> >
> > Does building ghc/haskell platform requires some special voodoo?
> >
> > Since the binary distro for haskell platform clearly works for OSX.
> >
>
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> wmacgyver:
> > I have a stupid question.
> >
> > Does building ghc/haskell platform requires some special voodoo?
> >
> > Since the binary distro for haskell platform clearly works for OSX.
> >
> > But why is it that both macports and homebrew
wmacgyver:
> I have a stupid question.
>
> Does building ghc/haskell platform requires some special voodoo?
>
> Since the binary distro for haskell platform clearly works for OSX.
>
> But why is it that both macports and homebrew seems to
> never work like clockwork?
>
> I use macports for erla
I have a stupid question.
Does building ghc/haskell platform requires some special voodoo?
Since the binary distro for haskell platform clearly works for OSX.
But why is it that both macports and homebrew seems to
never work like clockwork?
I use macports for erlang, python and heck, even sbcl.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> cpatti:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> >
> > The following comments about the Haskell Platform appeared in the
> > State of Haskell survey.
> >
> >http://www.johantibell.com/files/state-of-has
Hello Don,
Tuesday, August 10, 2010, 12:30:29 AM, you wrote:
> * Apart from then Haskell Platform, software installation is a pain.
> Cabal install is bearable, if painful, for developers, but it is
> unacceptable for end users.
btw, once i've proposed to publish ${library}.hackage f
cpatti:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
>
> The following comments about the Haskell Platform appeared in the
> State of Haskell survey.
>
> http://www.johantibell.com/files/state-of-haskell-2010.html
>
> * I also think Haskell platform isn't get
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> The following comments about the Haskell Platform appeared in the
> State of Haskell survey.
>
>http://www.johantibell.com/files/state-of-haskell-2010.html
>
>* I also think Haskell platform isn't getting enough push. People still
>
thank you for going through and pick out the valuable ones.
not sure if I should be happy or hide behind a rock that my comments
made it. :)
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> The following comments about the Haskell Platform appeared in the
> State of Haskell survey.
>
> ht
The following comments about the Haskell Platform appeared in the
State of Haskell survey.
http://www.johantibell.com/files/state-of-haskell-2010.html
* Apart from then Haskell Platform, software installation is a pain.
Cabal install is bearable, if painful, for developers, but it is
18 matches
Mail list logo
