Re: map and fmap

2006-08-22 Thread Iavor Diatchki
Hello, On 8/22/06, John Meacham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am not talking about type signatures, I am talking about having to annotate in the middle of a term. f x y | x `member` map g freeVars y = having to become f x y | x `member` map g (freeVars y :: [Id]) = There is no ne

Re: map and fmap

2006-08-22 Thread John Meacham
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 01:52:45PM -0700, Iavor Diatchki wrote: > Hello, > I agree that this is a small change, and I don't expect that it will happen. > > On 8/21/06, John Meacham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Yeah, the change doesn't seem worth it to me. And I still have concerns > >about ambigu

Re: map and fmap

2006-08-22 Thread Iavor Diatchki
Hello, I agree that this is a small change, and I don't expect that it will happen. On 8/21/06, John Meacham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yeah, the change doesn't seem worth it to me. And I still have concerns about ambiguity errors, if a beginner ever has to use an explicit type signature it sort