what about moving the record system to an addendum?

According to , ticket #99 was rejected, but the tickets own page, , says "probably yes". Which is it? I was about to propose this myself, but decided to check the trac just in case i

Re: what about moving the record system to an addendum?

On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 17:30 -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote: > According to , > ticket #99 was rejected, but the tickets own page, > , says > "probably yes". Which is it? > > I was about

Re: what about moving the record system to an addendum?

Well, without a replacement, it seems odd to remove it. Also, Haskell currently doesn't _have_ a record syntax (I think it was always a misnomer to call it that) it has 'labeled fields'. None of the proposed record syntaxes fit the same niche as labeled fields so I don't see them going away even if