On 7 Jan 2011, at 22:25, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Have you considered deciding about individual proposals as and when
they
are completed, rather than making a decision about all proposals each
September? This could also avoid merge-conflicts between the report
deltas for proposals that touch the same bit of the report.
I can see advantages and disadvantages of both approaches -
incremental decisions vs a single time-limited big decision. I think
it all depends on the engagement of the community. If there is clear
consensus from the community on a particular proposal, I can imagine
the committee incrementally accepting it. If consensus is not clear,
I think a decision is likely to be deferred until voting-time.
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
