On 09/08/2017 12:45 AM, Carter Schonwald wrote:
please say yes or no. its quite easy with email . i'm not going to write
that little proposal if folks wont accept it :)
I'd love to see those constraints go. But it is important that the full
ramifications are clearly articulated.
Best,
/Henrik
well sure, i'm happy to write the 3 line diff, but because of the sheer
unambiguity of this i'd rather get the votes on email before botthering to
write the diff, at which point the main question is whether i wrote the
diff correctly
please say yes or no. its quite easy with email . i'm not going
Sending to the mailing list instead of to Herbert alone...
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Herbert Valerio Riedel
wrote:
Hello!
>
> On 2017-09-07 at 18:16:39 +0200, Mario Blazevic wrote:
> >> Btw, here's an old commit which updates the class diagram to this
> >> effect for the report:
> >>
> >>
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Richard Eisenberg
wrote:
> I don't mean to be a killjoy, but I think even something as simple as this
> should have a proposal. We still have to draft the changes to the Report
> associated with this change, and at least one is non-obvious: now numeric
> literals i
I don't mean to be a killjoy, but I think even something as simple as this
should have a proposal. We still have to draft the changes to the Report
associated with this change, and at least one is non-obvious: now numeric
literals induce an Eq constraint (which should be mentioned). I'm certainl
Hello!
On 2017-09-07 at 18:16:39 +0200, Mario Blazevic wrote:
>> Btw, here's an old commit which updates the class diagram to this
>> effect for the report:
>>
>> https://github.com/hvr/haskell-report/commit/
>> 339ea257ee8b0451fbba388480566efac6ecbbd3
>>
> Ha, I wasn't aware of that repository.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel
wrote:
> "yes" :-)
>
> Btw, here's an old commit which updates the class diagram to this
> effect for the report:
>
> https://github.com/hvr/haskell-report/commit/
> 339ea257ee8b0451fbba388480566efac6ecbbd3
>
>
Ha, I wasn't aware of that rep
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Carter Schonwald <
carter.schonw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All yays from committee members please reply with yes to this email :)
>
Yes please.
___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.or
"yes" :-)
Btw, here's an old commit which updates the class diagram to this
effect for the report:
https://github.com/hvr/haskell-report/commit/339ea257ee8b0451fbba388480566efac6ecbbd3
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Carter Schonwald
wrote:
> All yays from committee members please reply with ye
If you don't do it, the Report will just be inaccurate.
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 at 11:43 Carter Schonwald
wrote:
> All yays from committee members please reply with yes to this email :)
>
> -Carter
> ___
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime@haskell.
All yays from committee members please reply with yes to this email :)
-Carter
___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
There's food sans line near c5
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:23 AM Henrik Nilsson <
henrik.nils...@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Reminder: Haskell' is meeting lunchtime today, so shortly after 12:30.
>
> We now, thank to Jeremy Gibbons, also have a room: C5.
>
> So grab lunch and then go to
Hi all,
Reminder: Haskell' is meeting lunchtime today, so shortly after 12:30.
We now, thank to Jeremy Gibbons, also have a room: C5.
So grab lunch and then go to C5.
Best,
/Henrik
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential informati
13 matches
Mail list logo
