On 18/12/2018 07:38, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
Hello Mario et al.,

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:17 AM Mario Blažević <blama...@ciktel.net> wrote:
While you're reviewing AMP, please take a bit of time to also comment on
the related new MonadPlus excise proposal at
https://github.com/haskell/rfcs/pull/23

The proposal is very short so it should be an easy decision. Thank you.
As I've explained already on the RFC, I refuse (i.e. to make this very
clear: I'm exercising my veto) to accept the AMP change without also
at least a commitment to MFP and MRP. And note that the committee was
created with the explicit request from SPJ that it ought to be a
consensus-based decision process rather than a democratic voting
process -- and there isn't consensus in this matter as far as I'm
concerned.


To be clear: you would prefer the Report's status quo to AMP without MFP and MRP? Because that looks likely to be where we're headed unless we wait out GHC implementing both and see if everyone is resigned to that result.

_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Reply via email to