nge a lot, so I assume I'd find
similar use in Haskell lists. Of course, the layout proposal solves
this problem too, but it feels like a larger change.
Regarding tuples vs. lists, I care a lot less about tuples because
rearranging them usually requires a type change in lots of places, so
fixing a
On 8/20/06, John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "Jon Fairbairn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To
> reinforce what Aaron said, if a programme works now, it'll
> still work if map suddenly means fmap.
Well, this isn't quite true, is it? Here's an example:
class Foldable f where
fold :: (a ->
ure called (cut) documented at
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-26/srfi-26.html. I haven't read the
SRFI, but it would make sense to incorporate their experience in any
new feature for Haskell.
Jeffrey Yasskin
On 1/24/06, Dinko Tenev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I created a feature request
