Re: Unsafe hGetContents

2009-10-06 Thread Nicolas Pouillard
Excerpts from Simon Marlow's message of Tue Oct 06 14:59:06 +0200 2009: > On 03/10/2009 19:59, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Nicolas Pouillard: > > > >> Excerpts from Florian Weimer's message of Wed Sep 16 22:17:08 +0200 2009: > >>> Are there any plans

Re: Unsafe hGetContents

2009-09-21 Thread Nicolas Pouillard
Excerpts from Simon Marlow's message of Mon Sep 21 11:52:41 +0200 2009: > On 17/09/2009 13:58, Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > > Excerpts from Florian Weimer's message of Wed Sep 16 22:17:08 +0200 2009: > >> Are there any plans to get rid of hGetContents and the semi-

Re: Unsafe hGetContents

2009-09-21 Thread Nicolas Pouillard
process for Haskell Prime proposals is here > > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/Process An alternate proposition (instead of removing it) would to to move it to System.IO.Unsafe. -- Nicolas Pouillard http://nicolaspouillard.fr __

Re: Unsafe hGetContents

2009-09-17 Thread Nicolas Pouillard
ng invalidating most of the transformations > which are expected to be valid in a pure language.) Would you consider something like [1] as an acceptable replacement? [1]: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/safe-lazy-io -- Nicolas Pouillard htt